References
1. Eddy DM. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990 Jan 19;263(3):441–3. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Anatomy of a decision - PubMed (nih.gov) Only Abstract available.
2. Drummond M, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. 2008 International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24:3, 244–258.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care/article/key-principles-for-the-improved-conduct-of-health-technology-assessments-for-resource-allocation-decisions/BADE4DC1B4A143B951460AB8E1819EF2 Only Abstract available.
3. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, Hansen HP, Lo Scalzo A, Mossman J, Single A. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jul;26(3):334-40.(PDF) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (researchgate.net)
4. Bhatti Y, Hansen HF, Rieper O. Development of the evidence movement, organisation and work method. A mapping report. Copenhagen: AKF-Forlag; 2006
5. Kristensen FB & Sigmund H (ed.) Health Technology Assessment HandbookCopenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health, 2007
6. Stone DH. Design a questionnaire. BMJ 1993;307:1264-1266.
7. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018). CASP Qualitative Checklist. Link available at: CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf (casp-uk.net)
8. Mette Frahm Olsen , Eik Bjerre , Maria Damkjær Hansen, Jørgen Hilden , Nino Emanuel Landler, Britta Tendal, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28215182/